This is a real article, lol
this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
298 points (98.7% liked)
GenZedong
4302 readers
192 users here now
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
- No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
- We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
- If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
- Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
- For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
- Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Besides being a fucking ugly graph where you can barely read the node labels, I also like that this one pretty much admits democrats are clustered along the other reactionaries.
They also don't describe how they even got that clustering (or the network itself) in the first place. I think it's safe to assume they either nicked it from the web or got an inexperienced intern to just do whatever with a Jupyter notebook.
Is it a network of "common posters"? Of links in sidebar? In cross-posts?
Data science is what happens when "programmers think they are experts in everything that deals with computers" is taken to its most extreme. This field needs a purge, for the sake of all actual statisticians.
Science is when you never show your methodology, because it came to you in ~~a dream~~ a linear regression.
Edit: why the heck is Anarcho_Capitalism plotted between Feminism, feminisms and Radical_Feminism?
The thing is, they usually aren't even experts in that. Your typical programmer seems to have no idea how computers actually work, and thinks they're magical self-sufficient machines that will someday be able to run entire economies with no actual production happening.
Can confirm, I'm a programmer and all we do is pray to the machine spirit and hopefully our next ~~human sacrifice~~ intern will please it.
As a programmer, this is clearly dark magic:
Not only is it impossible to read the node labels, it's even more impossible to tell what is connected to what. At some point you are better off not showing the connections at all. Did an AI visualize this graph?
Half wonder if it would be clearer to show what isn't connected
They put "anarcho"-capitalism, the meme ideology that has the most incel energy, right next to all the different kinds of feminism. Also, "anarcho"-capitalism os closer to radical feminism than it is to objectivism, the pseudophilosophical drivel that is essentially boils down to being a flavour of "an"caps that are more open about their hatred for the poor. How can anyone take this seriously?