you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 3 years ago (1 child)

You don’t buy a heavily liberal swayed network and flip it heavily conservative.

That was never the point. The point was that it would either change, or die from the $13bn debt the purchase saddled Twitter with.

  • Musk paid $26 bn, underwritten by Tesla stock.
  • $5 bn was from other investors, including a Saudi prince.
  • $13 bn was a loan Twitter took out to buy itself on Musk's behalf.

The "heavy debt" that drives Twitter's cashflow into the negative is a direct result of the purchase.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I have to disagree because I feel “the point” is profitability. My comment shows a direct issue with profitability when liberal-swayed advertisers have to exit because of a network’s new direction.

    I do understand your argument though. That’s another massive layer that will be impossible to overcome.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments