this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
-35 points (12.8% liked)

Conservative

380 readers
6 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So what?

Do you think the solution to mis-/dis-information is censorship or otherwise attempting to marginalize what you believe are "garbage and lies"? What makes his arguments invalid? Which of his statements are false and lies? How do you know? And why are you definitely right and why is he definitely wrong?

There's this really interesting humans do. We become convinced of some viewpoint, whether through reason or, more likely, uncritical acceptance of some framework. It's the right viewpoint. We assume others must also share our viewpoint. The truth is obvious to us. So disagreement is often treated as lies. The one who disagrees knows the truth, but chooses to say otherwise. They're nefarious, despicable, and disrespectful for their duplicity in the face of an obvious truth.

But here's the thing: people genuinely hold beliefs different than you. What you see as "faulty, intentionally dishonest foundations" can only be true if you are of the mind of Pizzamane and can definitively say he believes in something else entirely. You must have the mind of Pizzamane. Unless you're really a psychic, you cannot do that. He may actually believe the foundations of his beliefs and you've been wrong this whole time. You can't know that's true either.

So what to do?

As hard as it might be, you have no choice but to except Pizzamane and other liberals and leftists at face value. You can consider our beliefs as garbage all you want. But leftists have every right to participate in this community, just as you do. And, I assure you, we often consider your beliefs garbage. When we disagree, then we should argue about the arguments, the statements and conclusions.

In short, he, or anyone else for that matter, will not be banned by me as long as they bring arguments. (...and don't tell people to fuck off...😠)

If all mankind minus one were of one opinion, and only one person wereof the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind.β€”John Stuart Mill

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Do you think the solution to mis-/dis-information is censorship or otherwise attempting to marginalize what you believe are "garbage and lies"?

Yes. When people continuously are shown to be bad actors uninterested in the actual facts, yes, it's good for the health of a community built around discussion to remove such a person since all letting them stay does is place an extra burden on everyone else to continuously correct the lies such that they don't propagate to unknowing people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

When people continuously are shown to be bad actors uninterested in the actual facts, yes, it’s good for the health of a community built around discussion to remove such a person

Funny how this standard applies to me, but not the conservatives around here who are throwing insults around (one of whom is a mod).

I believe there is a term for it, a double standard.

I'd like for this community to have high quality discussions. But it never will so long as the rules aren't enforced on conservatives and leftists alike.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Funny how this standard applies to me, but not the conservatives around here who are throwing insults around (one of whom is a mod).

Calling an anti-intellectual troll on their bad behavior is not equivalent to being an anti-intellectual troll. I'd also like high quality discussions, but unfortunately you're still here

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

’d also like high quality discussions

I very much doubt that given how many times you've insulted me for making an argument.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Only because you've demonstrated that you're either incapable or unwilling to acknowledge basic facts

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You keep saying that, but it doesn't mean anything. You never present facts in the first place. You just immediately dismiss what I say out of hand.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago

I already presented facts, numerous times. Your intentional refusal to engage with the truth doesn't mean it's my fault for not trying