▲ 472 ▼ Elon Musk says Twitter cash flow is negative due to ad revenue declines, ‘heavy debt’ (www.cnbc.com) submitted 3 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world 74 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 147 points 3 years ago (3 children) What? The super genius couldn't turn it into a cash machine? I thought he was the smartest (and funniest) person on the planet! permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Bonehead@kbin.social 93 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (3 children) I think this is the saddest part, at least for him. Before Twitter, a lot of people thought he was relatively intelligent to be a part of a groundbreaking electric car company, a crazy tunnel digging company, and wild space vehicle company doing innovative things. Now since Twitter, we see an insanely rich narcissistic meglomaniac that was kept out of most Tesla big decisions as he just wanted the publicity for himself, the tunnel digging company was nothing more than a way to interfere with green projects, SpaceX did the same thing as Tesla and succeeded despite Musk's involvement, and a once respected medium of open communication worth a reported $44 billion dollars devolve into a cess pool of bigotry and arbitrary restrictions. Whatever good will he built for himself over the years that saw him even get a cameo in a Marvel movie next to Tony Stark, he's burned through most of it in the eyes of a lot of people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] soundasleep@kbin.social 49 points 3 years ago (1 child) It's great for everyone with imposter syndrome! I used to fear I was too inexperienced, inept, unprofessional... but then this happened 😅 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world 19 points 3 years ago Does your daddy own an emerald mine though? That's kind of the key here. permalink fedilink source parent [–] rtxn@lemmy.world 31 points 3 years ago (2 children) SpaceX and Tesla both grew with his continuous involvement. The managers were trained (out of necessity) to keep his "genius" in check without destroying the company or getting themselves fired. In a sense, Musk's continuous presence gave the companies a form of immunity. When he infested the bird, the managers didn't know how to protect it. It was like bringing smallpox to the new world. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] clutchmatic@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago Also, there were no managers left after Musk's big purge permalink fedilink source parent [–] clutchmatic@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago Also, there were no managers left after Musk's big purge permalink fedilink source parent [–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago His new revenue is from oligarchs, not customers. permalink fedilink source parent [–] dojan@lemmy.world 14 points 3 years ago Buying Twitter was just him getting a fleshlight for his ego. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Badtouchspez@lemm.ee 6 points 3 years ago Well his mum says he is so it must be true. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bonehead@kbin.social 93 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (3 children) I think this is the saddest part, at least for him. Before Twitter, a lot of people thought he was relatively intelligent to be a part of a groundbreaking electric car company, a crazy tunnel digging company, and wild space vehicle company doing innovative things. Now since Twitter, we see an insanely rich narcissistic meglomaniac that was kept out of most Tesla big decisions as he just wanted the publicity for himself, the tunnel digging company was nothing more than a way to interfere with green projects, SpaceX did the same thing as Tesla and succeeded despite Musk's involvement, and a once respected medium of open communication worth a reported $44 billion dollars devolve into a cess pool of bigotry and arbitrary restrictions. Whatever good will he built for himself over the years that saw him even get a cameo in a Marvel movie next to Tony Stark, he's burned through most of it in the eyes of a lot of people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] soundasleep@kbin.social 49 points 3 years ago (1 child) It's great for everyone with imposter syndrome! I used to fear I was too inexperienced, inept, unprofessional... but then this happened 😅 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world 19 points 3 years ago Does your daddy own an emerald mine though? That's kind of the key here. permalink fedilink source parent [–] rtxn@lemmy.world 31 points 3 years ago (2 children) SpaceX and Tesla both grew with his continuous involvement. The managers were trained (out of necessity) to keep his "genius" in check without destroying the company or getting themselves fired. In a sense, Musk's continuous presence gave the companies a form of immunity. When he infested the bird, the managers didn't know how to protect it. It was like bringing smallpox to the new world. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] clutchmatic@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago Also, there were no managers left after Musk's big purge permalink fedilink source parent [–] clutchmatic@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago Also, there were no managers left after Musk's big purge permalink fedilink source parent [–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago His new revenue is from oligarchs, not customers. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] soundasleep@kbin.social 49 points 3 years ago (1 child) It's great for everyone with imposter syndrome! I used to fear I was too inexperienced, inept, unprofessional... but then this happened 😅 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world 19 points 3 years ago Does your daddy own an emerald mine though? That's kind of the key here. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world 19 points 3 years ago Does your daddy own an emerald mine though? That's kind of the key here. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 31 points 3 years ago (2 children) SpaceX and Tesla both grew with his continuous involvement. The managers were trained (out of necessity) to keep his "genius" in check without destroying the company or getting themselves fired. In a sense, Musk's continuous presence gave the companies a form of immunity. When he infested the bird, the managers didn't know how to protect it. It was like bringing smallpox to the new world. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] clutchmatic@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago Also, there were no managers left after Musk's big purge permalink fedilink source parent [–] clutchmatic@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago Also, there were no managers left after Musk's big purge permalink fedilink source parent
[–] clutchmatic@lemmy.world 10 points 3 years ago Also, there were no managers left after Musk's big purge permalink fedilink source parent
[–] clutchmatic@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago Also, there were no managers left after Musk's big purge permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago His new revenue is from oligarchs, not customers. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dojan@lemmy.world 14 points 3 years ago Buying Twitter was just him getting a fleshlight for his ego. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Badtouchspez@lemm.ee 6 points 3 years ago Well his mum says he is so it must be true. permalink fedilink source parent