this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2024
402 points (87.5% liked)

Share Funny Videos, Images, Memes, Quotes and more

2476 readers
255 users here now

#funny

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Eh. Fission is in fact a terrible power source. Eternally deadly leftovers, critical failures have the potential to devastate whole regions of the planet for decades or more.

Mining and refining the fuel is similarly harmful to the environment as processing coal. It is also not much cheaper than to go for the actually best solution called renewables. Wind and solar are both reasonably cheap at this point, and for example China was recently in my news feed for building an insane amount of solar in the last year (something like more than the U.S. in the last 10 years combined).

Obviously this is the correct choice for the future, likely paired with fusion power, which when it eventually works, comes with all the advantages of nuclear fission and none of its drawbacks or dangers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Eternally deadly leftovers,

Somebody doesn't know the bare basics of physics involved.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Im sure we can argue semantics here about reprocessing the stuff, eternal not actually being eternal and so forth, doesn’t really change much.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It does change everything, when people fear nuclear waste, they talk about literally eternal. Otherwise we could say that reforestation is not possible, because it takes 70 years (if you are not just growing wood for fuel, furniture and mulch, but restoring a system).

If it's not literally eternal, then it's a working cycle which can be used and be more efficient.

EDIT: I've realized that the thing I'm remembering was written about fast-neutron reactors, which most are not, so you are right usually. It's actually funny that Russia makes more ecologically clean reactors than USA. Stupid, but funny.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

China is indeed a great example of what actual transition from fossil fuels looks like. China is building nuclear reactors faster than any other country right now because they realize that renewables like solar and wind are insufficient on their own.