▲ 582 ▼ Joe Rogan and Bret Weinstein Promote AIDS Denialism to an Audience of Millions (www.vice.com) submitted 2 years ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world 91 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world -7 points 2 years ago (1 child) Many reasonable people believe all sorts of nutty shit. Until it becomes actively harmful, I don’t care much. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm not seeing how you can be both reasonable and believe there is a vast government and scientific conspiracy to cover up multiple fake moon landings. Sort of seems like a one or the other thing to me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Maybe you need to get out more 😝 I don’t personally believe in it, but I also don’t care if you do. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's not about what you personally care about, it's about what you are defining as a reasonable person. It does explain why so many people think Trump is a very stable genius though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago (2 children) I suspect he means reasonable as in "a normal decent person you could be good neighbors or colleagues with" not a reasonable person as in "a person endowed with the faculty of reason". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago I see. That makes more sense. Thank you. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago Bingo. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'm not seeing how you can be both reasonable and believe there is a vast government and scientific conspiracy to cover up multiple fake moon landings. Sort of seems like a one or the other thing to me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Maybe you need to get out more 😝 I don’t personally believe in it, but I also don’t care if you do. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's not about what you personally care about, it's about what you are defining as a reasonable person. It does explain why so many people think Trump is a very stable genius though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago (2 children) I suspect he means reasonable as in "a normal decent person you could be good neighbors or colleagues with" not a reasonable person as in "a person endowed with the faculty of reason". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago I see. That makes more sense. Thank you. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago Bingo. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Maybe you need to get out more 😝 I don’t personally believe in it, but I also don’t care if you do. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's not about what you personally care about, it's about what you are defining as a reasonable person. It does explain why so many people think Trump is a very stable genius though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago (2 children) I suspect he means reasonable as in "a normal decent person you could be good neighbors or colleagues with" not a reasonable person as in "a person endowed with the faculty of reason". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago I see. That makes more sense. Thank you. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago Bingo. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's not about what you personally care about, it's about what you are defining as a reasonable person. It does explain why so many people think Trump is a very stable genius though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago (2 children) I suspect he means reasonable as in "a normal decent person you could be good neighbors or colleagues with" not a reasonable person as in "a person endowed with the faculty of reason". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago I see. That makes more sense. Thank you. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago Bingo. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago (2 children) I suspect he means reasonable as in "a normal decent person you could be good neighbors or colleagues with" not a reasonable person as in "a person endowed with the faculty of reason". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago I see. That makes more sense. Thank you. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago Bingo. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago I see. That makes more sense. Thank you. permalink fedilink source parent