this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
1863 points (98.2% liked)

pics

19628 readers
168 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Pretty unnecessary in this digital age

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I disagree. Have you ever been to a real 70mm IMAX screening? I don't mean your typical "IMAX". There's only a handful in the whole world.

The quality is gorgeous, and the screens are huge. You also get significantly more of the frame than you will in traditional cinema and on bluray releases.

Don't call it unnecessary until you've actually seen it. Digital IMAX isn't close yet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The reason it's unnecessary is that digital can completely capture a 70mm in high enough resolution that you perceive no difference at all. 8 or 16K projection is completely feasible in commercial projection systems. It means the cinema only has to deal with a small box instead of an enormous roll of film.

That doesn't mean either digital IMAX since that's old tech using something like 2K projection which isn't adequate.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well you could argue making movies is unnecessary altogether. This is art and this is the medium used by the artist.

It's not about image quality of film vs digital, it's about the feel and texture of the experience as a whole.

Just knowing there is an actual film being rolled and having light shun through it while watching it is part of that experience.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you can't tell the difference on the screen it should make no damn odds how the image was stored.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

And who says there's no difference on screen?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Lol I guess I meant shone. Anyways, with light shining through