this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
615 points (97.4% liked)
Asklemmy
43942 readers
736 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yes, you are correct according to a technical analysis by Greg Laughlin, an astronomer at Yale University.
The analysis considers the relative motion of planets in their orbits instead of just the simple measure of the average distance between planets.
Here is a step-by-step breakdown of this concept:
Most of the time we think of two planets' proximity as them sharing the same longitude in the sky, or them being at a point in their orbits where they align.
Yet, if you've got three bodies and by definition two of them have to be closest to each other, then itβs the one thatβs left out in the way we think of planet distances.
This average-distance calculation involves working out every single possible configuration of, say, Earth, Mercury and Venus β every possible location they could be in their orbits β and then calculating which two are closest.
Based on Laughlin's model, Mercury sits on average 1.04 astronomical units (AU) away from Earth β closer than Venus, our nearest neighbor, which sits an average of 1.14 AU away. (1 AU is the average Earth-Sun distance β about 149 million km.)
Extending that complex model to the outer planets, the closest planet to Neptune on average, turns out to be Mercury too, not Uranus!
Because Mercury is the planet that orbits the closest to the Sun, it is often closer to other planets despite the large overall distance. Mercury's faster orbit brings it regularly back close to other planets, including Neptune.
So, counter to simple intuitions about the structure of our Solar System, by considering the whole of planetary orbits and using this complex method of calculation, the nearest planet to any chosen planet often turns out to be Mercury.