this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
23 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

8651 readers
470 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Earlier this week I posted a 35-way Linux graphics card comparison featuring the new NVIDIA RTX 40 SUPER graphics cards and other recent AMD and NVIDIA hardware I had available while using the latest Linux drivers.

Intel Arc Graphics desktop graphics cards weren't part of that comparison for simply running out of time prior to the RTX 4080 SUPER embargo lift to facilitate that re-testing.

But for those interested, here is a fresh look at the Intel Arc Graphics A580 / A750 / A770 Linux performance against those NVIDIA GeForce and AMD Radeon graphics cards on Ubuntu Linux.

This article is a subset of the results from that prior article in looking at the workloads capable of handling Intel Arc Graphics DG2/Alchemist graphics cards and the current state of the Intel i915 + Mesa ANV / Iris drivers.

Linux 6.7 with Mesa 24.1-devel were used for testing, the same configuration as the AMD Radeon graphics on their open-source driver stack.

So for those wondering about the current performance of the Intel Arc Graphics A580/A750/A770 hardware on Linux against the competition, let's move on and look at these fresh numbers.


The original article contains 406 words, the summary contains 189 words. Saved 53%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!