this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
92 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37716 readers
326 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) company Anthropic has claimed to a US court that using copyrighted content in large language model (LLM) training data counts as “fair use”, however.

Under US law, “fair use” permits the limited use of copyrighted material without permission, for purposes such as criticism, news reporting, teaching, and research.

In October 2023, a host of music publishers including Concord, Universal Music Group and ABKCO initiated legal action against the Amazon- and Google-backed generative AI firm Anthropic, demanding potentially millions in damages for the allegedly “systematic and widespread infringement of their copyrighted song lyrics”.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 64 points 9 months ago (23 children)

…then maybe they shouldn’t exist. If you can’t pay the copyright holders what they’re owed for the license to use their materials for commercial use, then you can’t use ‘em that way without repercussions. Ask any YouTuber.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (9 children)

You might want to read this article by Kit Walsh, a senior staff attorney at the EFF, and this one by Katherine Klosek, the director of information policy and federal relations at the Association of Research Libraries. YouTube's one-sided strike-happy system isn't the real world.

Headlines like these let people assume that it’s illegal, rather than educate them on their rights.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 9 months ago (6 children)

When Annas-Archive or Sci-Hub get treated the same as these giant corporations, I'll start giving a shit about the "fair use" argument.

When people pirate to better the world by increasing access to information, the whole world gets together to try to kick them off the internet.

When giant companies with enough money to make Solomon blush pirate to make more oodles of money and not improve access to information, it's "fAiR uSe."

Literally everyone knew from the start that books3 was all pirated and from ebooks with the DRM circumvented and removed. It was noted when it was created it was basically the entirety of private torrent tracker Bibliotik.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

You don't see the difference between distributing someone else's content against their will and using their content for statistical analysis? There's a pretty clear difference between the two, especially as fair use is concerned.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)