this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
387 points (86.2% liked)

Leftism

2125 readers
2 users here now

Our goal is to be the one stop shop for leftism here at lemmy.world! We welcome anyone with beliefs ranging from SocDemocracy to Anarchism to post, discuss, and interact with our community. We are a democratic community, and as such, welcome metaposts that seek to amend the rules through consensus. Post articles, videos, questions, analysis and more. As long as it's leftist, it's welcome here!

Rules:

Posting Expectations:

Sister Communities:

[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Solarpunk memes [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Also, The Girl Scouts explicitly rejected a large donation from an anti-trans organization: https://www.seattlemet.com/news-and-city-life/2015/06/donor-says-girl-scouts-can-t-use-100k-gift-for-transgender-girls

Girl Scouting is for all girls. Trans girls are girls, so they belong in Girl Scouts.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

If you read the comment chain with OP you'll see my argument present is that the "fundraiser" for the troop nets 22% while taking 78% of while only having 24% cost.

Please explain to me what value is provided for 54% of the revenue after having already paid the cost to get the cookies made and packaged and already having paid dues to access this program?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That 54% helps to pay for the camp facilities and subsidize participation in summer camp and troops for low-income kids that otherwise wouldn't be able to participate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Hi medgremlin, you are correct. I misread the 2023 earnings report where it stated fundraising was $4.4 million as revenue instead of an expense, so when you read it like I did originally it would mean they make 97% from dues and other means and 3% from fundraising (which is false). Which is why I tried to defend my position that there's no value in taking that from the children and it's just a cash grab.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Okay at this point I just have to assume you are a troll who likes to argue without caring about or understanding a topic. If you did care, the infromation is readily available. But your intent is to argue, so here you are sealioning.

It's easy to say "100% should go to the cause", but that's literally never how these things work. Go check up on any charity you like, none of them donate 100% to one thing. The scouts are running a drive for various causes, and to try and reach for "exploration" because it funds scholarships for under privligaged scouts is bad faith.

As I said before, this isn't a topic that is worth time or energy. You can insist on your hard line definition but understand that most people don't agree it's exploitation and the girls know they are helping a good cause. I know it sounds spicy to say it's a consisparcy harming kids, but that doesn't reflect reality.

Go argue about actual child labor laws and leave the girl scouts and comet pizza alone.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Not a troll, I misread the 2023 earnings report where it states fundraising was $4.4 million as revenue instead of an expense, so when you read it like I did originally it would mean they make 97% from dues and other means and 3% from fundraising. Which is why I tried to defend my position that there's no value in taking that from the children and it's just a cash grab.

While I understand that the mistake is entirely my own and I apologize to you, perhaps in the future just point out the flaw in their argument instead of calling them a qanon conspiracy nutjob.