this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
430 points (83.1% liked)

Technology

59299 readers
4561 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image.::Artists and researchers are exposing copyrighted material hidden within A.I. tools, raising fresh legal questions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So do you want to shutdown Google because I can type "spongebob squarepants" into Google images and Google with give me an image of spongebob?

Please put some thought into the implications of what you're saying outside of AI before you make a knee-jerk reaction like that.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Those images in the search results are one of three categories:

  1. Officially licensed and distributed works that Spongebob IP owners signed off on

  2. Fair use works, namely noncommercial and parody

  3. Illegal works the posters of which can be sued

Google themselves didn't create those images. Google didn't intentionally profit off of illegal works without giving credit. Google didn't post those images themselves. AI did all of those things.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't matter if Google creates the images.

It doesn't matter if they "intend" to profit from illegal works.

It doesn't matter if they "give credit" (this is the one that's the dumbest because it just reeks of ignorance, like thinking you can use whatever works you like as long as you put a credit to them in the description)

Google showing you copywritten images when you search for them is not different than when an AI does it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

It does actually matter if Google creates the images and then sells them directly. That is what this discussion is about. If you don't want to be a part of the discussion, fuck off then.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Imagine getting this riled up over a stranger on lemmy thinking something different to you.

Maybe put the phone down, take a deep breath and go for a walk outside for a moment.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I see you've abandoned your argument to express your mental image of somebody you've never seen or heard before. I accept your resignation, then, happy to help you see the light.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

Jesus christ this is the most redditor comment.

Okay buddy, I resign. So you can add another tally to your "Internet arguments won" board. I hope your mom makes extra tendies for you tonight in celebration.