this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
41 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

12 readers
1 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 2 years ago
 

Proponents boast that 802.11bb is 100 times faster than Wi-Fi and more secure.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Isn't WiFi technically light based? It's all just electromagnetic radiation

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

From the Wikipedia article on light:

Light or visible light is electromagnetic radiation that can be perceived by the human eye.

But also:

In physics, the term "light" may refer more broadly to electromagnetic radiation of any wavelength, whether visible or not.

So yeah, depends on your usage of the term “light”, but colloquially (and in this context), it’s referring to visible light.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Radio and light are the same thing from a physics standpoint, just different ranges of electromagnetic spectrum.

So phones and communication towers are basically flashlights blinking at each other using invisible light, to which walls/buildings and stuff are translucent :)

Or like x-ray is pretty much a camera flash that can shine through bodies.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Buildings and stuff aren't all that translucent to radio waves. You can't just point two radios at each other with a building between them and expect them to "see" each other. They can bounce and reflect off them like light would off mirrors and reflective surfaces and even be bent by changes in the atmosphere itself, though.

A powerful enough radio, though, is kinda like when you can see light shining through your arm if you hold a flashlight to it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s why I didn’t use “transparent”. Translucent is exactly what they are though, with wood being more see-through and concrete less so. But a regular concrete wall still lets enough through not to drop most connections.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

@fearout And wifi Mimo used reflection of the walls to propagate the signal, just like light bouncing off white surfaces and reflecting further away.

@wave_walnut @peter @elscallr @Kolanaki

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Eh. It's less radio transmitters are like flashlights more flashlights are transmitters.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

@peter Yeah, that's a bit confusing. Wifi is based on radio spectrum, and Lifi is based partly on infrared. And infrared light has more energy. So I guess that's one of the downsides probably, that it requires more energy to produce that? I'm not an expert or anything like that.