this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
47 points (66.7% liked)

Technology

59647 readers
2684 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
47
Training Generative AI Models on Copyrighted Works Is Fair Use - Change My Mind (mastodon.lawprofs.org)
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
101 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I fucked with the title a bit. What i linked to was actually a mastodon post linking to an actual thing. but in my defense, i found it because cory doctorow boosted it, so, in a way, i am providing the original source here.

please argue. please do not remove.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I agree with your statement as stated. (EDIT: title has changed since posting)

The part I have an issue with is the output that tends to fall into 4 categories:

  1. output that is creative and unique is acceptable

  2. output tricked into revealing source is infringement

  3. output not creative, as in biometric identification, utilizes the entirety of copyright work in a non-transformative way and needs to be licensed.

  4. output of creative work, while not copyrightable, can still infringe trademark.