167
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Yuritopiaposadism@hexbear.net to c/politics@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Philosoraptor@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago

A moral hazard is just when removing (or mitigating) the consequences for some risky behavior makes the behavior more common, thus potentially resulting in more harm than leaving the consequence in place would have. The stock example is insurance: if I know that in the event of my house burning down, insurance will compensate me for any losses, maybe I'm more likely to be careless with my lighter, leading to my house being more likely to burn down.

In that sense, porky-happy causing a mass extinction in the name of shareholder value sort of is a moral hazard, because most capitalists are shielded from the direct harm associated with their actions, as those harms are exported to the global south and onto non-human species first.

this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
167 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23055 readers
11 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to The Labour Community.

Take any slop posts to the slop trough

Main is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS