this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
-37 points (25.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43822 readers
1011 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It seems as though we are going backwards. We were doing so well in realising that all human beings are worthy individuals with emotional and intellectual depth, yet now so many of us don't seem to see any problem with society encouraging many to reduce themselves to sexual objects. How is this rationalised?

edit: typo

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

To the extent that sex workers are objectified, it is a direct result of misogyny, which teaches that it is acceptable to treat women as objects, and capitalism, which teaches that it is acceptable to treat workers as objects. At the confluence of these two industries we find pornography.

That said, I believe it is possible to do sex work in a way that is liberating and not objectifying, and in my opinion the hyper-fixation on the objectification of women in pornography is itself a result of misogyny in our culture. Every industry objectifies and mistreats workers, so why do we discuss this issue so frequently that the term objectification is practically exclusive to pornography and related contexts? In my view it is because patriarchy requires women to be “pure” and “unsullied” by sex so as to maximize their value to men. The issue gets subconsciously mixed into genuine concerns for the well-being of sex workers. Together these impulses often lead to paternalistic and unhelpful “solutions” like arresting sex workers, or FOSTA and SESTA which claim to be for the protection of sex workers but according to the vast majority I’ve heard speak on this issue are extremely harmful to their livelihood and wellbeing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Were you aware of the recent study talking about male microchimerism in the female brain?

Here it is.

Your talk about woman needing to remain 'pure' because of 'the patriarchy' made me think of it.

I don't see that they've identified any downstream impact from having extra DNA, but wouldn't it be funny if that actually did impact folks negatively?

Personally, I'm sure glad I'm not carrying around a historical record of the folks I've been 'very friendly' with...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

I did read an article on this topic recently and it is very fascinating but I’m not sure I understand that connection to what I was discussing.

Also, I think I also remembered reading that anyone can have microchimerism acquired through their mothers, so don’t be so sure that you are unaffected.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

That occurs as a result of carrying a male fetus, not from male sexual partners.