this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
8 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmygrad

771 readers
27 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(Sorry for any possible English mistake, I thought about this and wanted to read someone's idea on or against it but I can't find if there is a movement like it and what it would be called)

Like, we probably all agree that we are against capitalism but in order to achieve socialism (or directly communism) you must first develop the proletarian class as it is what is going to start the revolution.

So is there something like anarcho-communism, where they are opposed to having a socialist state as a way to develop communism, but that still believes in the importance of a socialist state in a utilitarian way to develop it's own group of revolutionaries ?

An idea according to which a socialist state will never achieve communism (for whatever reason, like the small difference between classes under socialism before it turns into communism that might become reactionaries and roll back change even under a dictatorship of the proletariat or something else) but there is going to be one more revolution starting from the (relative) bottom in the socialist state.

Because from my basic understanding of ML for example, the transition between socialism and communism is supposed to be smooth. But maybe I'm wrong ? Feel free to correct me on anything.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Idk but maybe we should create a secret society of “eternal revolution”, which would prop up a vanguard party to create a dictatorship of the proletariat. But after that revolution, it would then prop up another revolution, an anti-state one.

Something like the 5 eyes and how intelligence works in the west to keep the bourgeoisie in power forever, but instead to keep having revolutions forever. Until we reach full blown communism.

Ofc only the most trusted revolutionary and pure Marxists could join. So that’s me. And no one else. I’ll report back on my success after we’ve achieved communism comrades 🫡

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Well, I hoped I would get to be in it since apparently I invented it but I guess you are the most Marxists among all of us since you said so and people don't lie on the internet. So, go and get us communism king (gender neutral)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

You can secretly be in, I’ll allow it. But just you. Because you were nice to me. That’s communism right?