this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
708 points (100.0% liked)

196

16272 readers
2338 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
708
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

see if your instance is one of them here: https://fedipact.veganism.social/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 24 points 8 months ago (25 children)

i honestly don't get the hate. i love the fact that i wont need two apps anymore to see the more mainstream people i used to follow on twitter. tje worst part about twitter going under is the fragmentation.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago (19 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend,_and_extinguish

It's happened so many times, and every time people thought "this time it's different".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (10 children)

but that doesn't really happen in a decentralized model.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Stop posting this unless you have an actual argument as to why it's not just FUD. This dumbass blogpost has been debunked over and over and over again.

Google Talk didn't kill XMPP.

XMPP didn't have a significant user base, Google Talk did, so while Google Talk supported XMPP, other open source XMPP clients got to ride their coattails and interact with a huge community and it felt like XMPP was thriving, when in reality Google Talk was what users cared about, not whether or not it connected to the rest of the minor XMPP networks, so when Google Talk decided to stop using XMPP, their users didn't care or switch and XMPP died.

But that's fundamentally not because Google killed it, it's because Google was the only thing keeping it alive.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)