this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
34 points (90.5% liked)
Asklemmy
43737 readers
1218 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Do you think the hollow core would make that much of a difference? The head of the key would still be solid and the depth required for each different size likely wouldn't account to much. There would probably maybe half an inch at the opposite end from the head. If someone used a t like design, with the top bit being where the grip and hollow portion are, I imagine that would likely cut down a bit on torque exposed directly to the hollow section.
Imagine bearing against a stack of papers. It's much more likely to deform than an equivalent size piece of wood.
Thinner parts make deformation and breaking more likely.
nothing fucks with tolerance like a twisting force, and that's the only force you're going to be applying to this thing.