Privacy

31996 readers

805 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Accept cookie banners with third-party cookies rejected (infosec.pub)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hi,

In Spain (and probably other places in Europe) we've recently seen a deluge of cookie banners that offer you the option to reject tracking cookies for a fee. The regular GDPR forms are therefore slightly broken, as you get several options: accept, reject (which doesn't work in most cases), and buy a subscription to reject. Consent-O-Matic, for example, is having a hard time. I don't doubt it'll get corrected in time, but I want to talk about something tangential.

Cookie consent has (at least) two layers: the browser layer (where we might delete cookies, reject third party cookies, etc) and the site UI layer (where we're presented with an option when we load the page). This means we can reject third-party cookies at the browser layer and then accept whatever form at the site UI layer.

With the set up mentioned above, is there really any difference between accepting cookies and rejecting cookies? No tracking cookie are going to get installed in my computer anyway. This, combined with an ad blocker, makes the browsing experience exactly the same whether I accept or reject the cookie form. Is there anything I'm missing here?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

When accepting a cookie, the cookie is stored on your machine locally for the duration of your browsing session on that site, IF you clear all cookies after a site visit with cookieautodelete. Or they are deleted after quitting the browser session, i.e. after exiting all open tabs AND you've enabled the setting to auto clear cookies.

With cookie autodelete (or firefox containers) and a normal browsing behavior it does not matter much if you accept or delete them, if there is no personal identifier like login data or IP address (always use vpn).

Consent o matic doesn't work on as many sites as istilldontcareaboutcookies and with the up and coming internal firefox functionality isdcaac will hopefully be obsolete within a year or so

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I recommend you look into web fingerprinting. IP and login data are no longer the only data required to pin point you on the web.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I know how web fingerprinting works. I don't visit sites regularly that use advanced techniques which shouldn't get my info, and if, I would overthink my web browsing behavior. For regular websites it's just too much of a hassle to use advanced fingerprinting methods

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

How do you know they don't use "advanced techniques"? I think you gravely overestimate the complexity of adding them to a website.