Technology

59299 readers

6280 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

192

Artists are making creative companies apologize for using AI (www.theverge.com)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

44 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Businesses that rely on creatives should probably avoid angering them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 30 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Wow. Such a blatantly AI generated image as well. The nerve.

Maybe the go-to way of avoiding this would be for companies to actually divulge who the artist is; credit them!

Edit: Feels like "count the AI giveaways on this image" could become a good drinking game.

Bizarre teeth arrangement
Some teeth are gum coloured
There are spontaneous toes in arbitrary places
The spine tuft migrates to the shoulder
There's some odd scaly and hairy shrimp-looking appendage next to the dragon
- Suppose it's the tail, but it's not attached
- Tail tuft is a different colour from the rest of the fur
Random third horn sprouting from the back of the neck

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You know, that's a good idea anyway.

I wonder though what that would mean for the copyright?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

Right? There's so much talk about paying artists in exposure but how often do artists actually get exposed?

Don't think copyright should be an issue. We know for example that the soundtrack to the Disney film Encanto was composed by Lin Manuel Miranda, but Walt Disney still owns the copyright. Same could go for the rest of the entire film, they do give credits to people who contributed but Disney still owns the copyright.

Having a signature somewhere on an advert shouldn't be a big deal.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

how'd you miss the tail? i don't think it's attached...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

You mean the hairy shrimp? I didn't.