The decision was “necessary to effectively manage risk exposure,” the company said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 3 years ago (4 children)

Huh, it's almost like for-profit insurance companies shouldn't be a thing...

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    On the other hand, maybe we should rebuilding in places with catastrophic disasters on an annual basis. How long should we keep doing the same thing expecting different results?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Florida actually has a state sponsored home owners insurance.

    https://www.citizensfla.com/who-we-are

    This was after private insurers started bailing out in the early 2000s when it became clear how ridiculously expensive it would be to provide hurricane insurance there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago

    I'm on Citizens. Every year I get a letter telling me they have the legal right to sell my policy if they find a comparable one in the private sector within 20% of what I'm paying. Every year they fail to find one. The best thing about Citizen's is that they can't leave the state.

  • source
  • parent