98
First Look at Hugh Grant as an Oompa Loompa in "Wonka"
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
98 points (94.5% liked)
Movies and TV Shows
12 readers
1 users here now
General discussion about movies and TV shows.
Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.
Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain
[spoilers]in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title's subject matter.
Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:
::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::
Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!
Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [[email protected]](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)
Related communities: [email protected] [email protected]
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
At first glance I thought this looks likes some gritty Tim burton reboot. Then I realized we already got that.
To be fair, the Tim Burton film was far closer to the original novel. And that's what I grew up with, so the 70s gene wilder version (that Dahl hated) never gelled with me.
Just like Stephen King hated the far superior The Shining movie. The author's can be wrong sometimes.
King: What's with these changes? Jack Torrence is supposed to overcome the evil and save his family!
Kubrick: Dude, have you even read this story? Jack Torrence is an irredeemable monster.
King: [tearing up] I'M THAT IRREDEEMABLE MONSTER
Idk, I liked the book more than the movie but maybe I'm missing something.
Kubrick's movie was a good, scary movie that was definitely inspired by the book.
The TV series was lower quality, but I believe a better adaptation of the book.
I really appreciate that movie version of Dr Sleep did an amazing job of blending Kubrick's version with King's novels. Enough so that I think it pulls Kubrick's movie back into line where it feels less divergent from the original book.
Oh, maybe this explains it.
According to King, the only conversation they about the book/film was Kubrick called him and asked whether he believed in God.
I (and my partner) have read into that Kubrick did indeed see into the book that King was writing about himself and wanted to get a handle on what kind of frame of reference King had in doing so.
I didnt read the original print of Charlie and the chocolate factory but:
Didnt dalh orginally write the oompah loompahs to be black pygmies from africa?
In the very first draft, which was changed upon initial release if I recall correctly?
It changed after his publisher made him do it.