▲ 836 ▼ Oops, wrong person. (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by YoorWeb@lemmy.world to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml 31 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] tourist@lemmy.world 51 points 2 years ago (8 children) why bother with the variations? think they're hoping to knock the same victim more than once? messed up permalink fedilink source hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Deebster@programming.dev 85 points 2 years ago Maybe it's an attempt to evade automated systems that check for spam. permalink fedilink source parent [–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 66 points 2 years ago (3 children) Probably a basic way to evade spam detection. If you start sending the exact same message to 500 people, most chat services will shut that shit down in an instant. But if you send unique messages, it makes you look more like a real person, and the chat system may let it slide. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Adalast@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children) What's bad is that modern spam detection can employ semantic algorithms so it would still catch all of them as the I'm as message. The use of synonyms in the optionals is a huge vulnerability in the scam. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) Well, it does not appear to be a terribly sophisticated system to begin with... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Adalast@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Touché permalink fedilink source parent [–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 30 points 2 years ago So that their fixed script isn't so predictable that we can just nuke them by looking for identical conversations. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago I would say more likely to get around bot protection. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Jknaraa@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago Could be to match the style of the target, to try and make the conversation feel more natural for them. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Deebster@programming.dev 85 points 2 years ago Maybe it's an attempt to evade automated systems that check for spam. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 66 points 2 years ago (3 children) Probably a basic way to evade spam detection. If you start sending the exact same message to 500 people, most chat services will shut that shit down in an instant. But if you send unique messages, it makes you look more like a real person, and the chat system may let it slide. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Adalast@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children) What's bad is that modern spam detection can employ semantic algorithms so it would still catch all of them as the I'm as message. The use of synonyms in the optionals is a huge vulnerability in the scam. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) Well, it does not appear to be a terribly sophisticated system to begin with... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Adalast@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Touché permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Adalast@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children) What's bad is that modern spam detection can employ semantic algorithms so it would still catch all of them as the I'm as message. The use of synonyms in the optionals is a huge vulnerability in the scam. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) Well, it does not appear to be a terribly sophisticated system to begin with... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Adalast@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Touché permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago (1 child) Well, it does not appear to be a terribly sophisticated system to begin with... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Adalast@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Touché permalink fedilink source parent
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 30 points 2 years ago So that their fixed script isn't so predictable that we can just nuke them by looking for identical conversations. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago I would say more likely to get around bot protection. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jknaraa@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago Could be to match the style of the target, to try and make the conversation feel more natural for them. permalink fedilink source parent