this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2023
97 points (90.1% liked)
Technology
58133 readers
4475 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Who else has a reusable rocket, in any form?
The supposedly reusable space shuttle, which had the deep pockets of government, did 135 launches...over 30 years, to the tune of about $200 billion.
"SpaceX estimated that Falcon 9 v1.0 development costs were on the order of US$300 million.[40] NASA estimated development costs of US$3.6 billion had a traditional cost-plus contract approach been used"
Space shuttle was nearly seven HUNDRED times greater cost. NASA admitted Falcon would've cost 100x more if they'd developed it, so I'm gonna say a real cost would've been 1000x more (like the shuttle), because we know how good governmental agencies are at exceeding budgets.
So throw money at it, eh? Like NASA? Because what SpaceX has done (apply private-sector, finance-controlled, Agile project management to spaceflight), resulted in a cost that's at worst ten PERCENT of NASA, in 1/30th of the time, without killing anyone, unlike NASA and it's crony companies.
Fuck Boeing, Northrop, GD, etc. Those bastards have had their time stealing from us via NASA cost-plus contracts and killing highly trained astronauts, just to pillage from the government. There's no excuse for the failures they've had.