Technology

59197 readers

2890 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

210

Supreme Court chief justice warns of dangers of AI in judicial work, suggests it is “always a bad idea” to cite non-existent court cases (www.independent.co.uk)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Supreme Court chief justice warns of dangers of AI in judicial work, suggests it is “always a bad idea” to cite non-existent court cases::Mr Roberts suggested there may come a time when conducting legal research without the help of AI is ‘unthinkable’

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts discussed AI and its possible impact on the judicial system in a year-end report published over the weekend.

Mr Roberts acknowledged that the emerging tech was likely to play an increased role in the work of attorneys and judges, but he did not expect to be fully replaced anytime soon.

In addition to those risks, popular LLM chatbots like ChatGPT and Google's Bard can produce false information — referred to as "hallucinations" rather than "mistakes" — which means users are rolling the dice anytime they take trust the bots without checking their work first.

Michael Cohen, Donald Trump's former lawyer and fixer, admitted that he had used an AI to look up court case records, which he then gave as a list of citations to his legal team.

Due to the potential pitfalls of AI reliance, Mr Roberts urged legal workers to exercise "caution and humility" when relying on the chatbots for their work.

The court has proposed a rule that would require lawyers to either certify that that did not rely on AI software to draft briefs, or that a human fact-checked and edited any text generated by a chatbot.

The original article contains 421 words, the summary contains 197 words. Saved 53%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!