United Kingdom
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
view the rest of the comments
you're going to see it in the final cost of the products though, which to be clear isn't a bad thing, but it's extremely disingenuous to act like there's no end cost to consumers when the companies are definitely going to pass that on. language like this tries to obscure that fact: it's actually true, but people take "the taxpayer" to mean "I won't pay more" but you certainly will.
I think this is a great idea and an important thing to do, but stop babying people about the costs: things cost money, and buying things that are difficult to dispose of has consequences that need to be dealt with, don't try to hide it.
my actual biggest wish, which I will never get because the administrative costs would be astronomical, is that the cost added to goods be directly tied to their recyclability (both in materials and labor) as it would incentivize building more easily recycled products by manufacturers to keep costs competitive.
What about the reduction in costs from having to collect flytipping of items down countryside lanes? That could offset.
that's a good point, I would love it to work out that way. I'm not super optimistic (esp since electronics aren't the things I typically see, but that's just my experience/bias), but it could help.
Interesting point. I guess the price of the individual product won't be differentiated based on cost of recycling, but there will still be an incentive for retailers and therefore manufacturers to make products last longer, which might be better in the long run?
yeah I don't know; I imagine the per-unit cost of this will be pretty low in the end, and won't incentivize much change at all to the products since it'll be a fraction of the cost, but I would love to be wrong: things that last longer and are supported longer are obviously the best choice, and feel in very short supply. but something is changing: look at the Android phones from Google and Samsung which have seen a tremendous increase in support length; that's (probably?) due to consumer demand and government pressures, so yeah it might matter in the end.