this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2023
14 points (93.8% liked)

Canada

7230 readers
401 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Despite all the strong language against the agreement that has been seen online, seems the membership has thought otherwise.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you have any insight into the politics behind why the negotiators may have settled for the deal they did, and why the union ultimately accepted the deal? I'm curious what happened.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Anything I can come up with would be speculative, but here's my take:

  • The talk around the picket line was that the bargaining group for the Treasury Board was really good at playing hardball, and the union may have felt they weren't going to get a better deal.
  • The strike pay battle chest was rumoured to be about $40-$45 million nationally, which sounds like a lot, but at $75 per member, per day, it's exhausted in 1-2 weeks depending on how many people actually hit the picket line. At eight days, (for the TB group at least), I could see the union wanting to start wrapping things up.
  • The ratification vote required that you either vote to ratify or vote to not ratify and go back on strike. People may not have necessarily liked the deal, but there were likely many not prepared to give the union another strike mandate.
  • The deal includes the pensionable bonus plus near two years of retroactive salary increases. That's money in peoples' now (or in the coming months at least). People are hurting these days, and that sounds a lot better than a mythical percentage point or two additional raise maybe 6-12 months further down the line.