Asklemmy

43822 readers

1407 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Does the reddit style format breed toxicity? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

110 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Does the reddit style format inherently make for a toxic environment? Or is it a culture of toxicity from the influx of reditors? For lack of a beter example, on stackoverflow, when someone down votes you, it comes with a comment saying how to improve. On mastodon, people can't downvote you. These platforms are a joy to use, lemmy is depressing if you post. Its depressing because every post or comment, no mater the quality comes with downvotes, and usually no criticism to accompany it, you are left not knowing if youve made a mistake, or if its just trolls, bots, or idiots. At the end you feel insulted not improved. What do you think?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Someone praising Stack Overflow, that's a new one. The most criticized thing about SO is the toxicity and elitism of the users. Downvoting almost always comes with no explanation there.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Well hold on there, im not tryna praise them. I think we need a free and federated alternative. I only mean to say that an answer always has some verbal feedback on it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The incrediblely low quality of the feedback is legendary there, though.

"How do I X?"

"Do not X. - Fin"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's the wrong way to go about things. You show them a clearly incorrect example of a code you need help with but say that it's a good code and don't believe anyone can do better. People will jump over themselves to correct you and provide helpful solutions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, Murphy's Law. Instead of asking a question, just post the wrong answer and someone will come along to correct you.