this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
199 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

34870 readers
80 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/1255003

A Canadian judge has ruled that the popular “thumbs-up” emoji not only can be used as a contract agreement, but is just as valid as an actual signature. The Saskatchewan-based judge made the ruling on the grounds that the courts must adapt to the “new reality” of how people communicate, as originally reported by The Guardian.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean if you’re going to dismiss the other party with simply a “👍” that leaves it very open to interpretation. IMO farmer deserves it. Plus, if you read the backstory and circumstances, this was a renewal of a contract they had signed many times over many years before, implying the thumb would be a positive affirmation and not a neutral one.

Want to save some money? Type “let me get back to you” instead!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can you even imagine a precedent that said that implied contracts are not valid would have? Trips to the supermarket would be hilarious.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Why? You pay before taking your things.

Now if you wanted to argue that in a restaurant, after having eaten the food, then it might be mildly interesting.