this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2023
517 points (94.5% liked)

Technology

59038 readers
3057 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Netflix Resumes Advertising on X After Elon Musk Controversy::Netflix has resumed advertising on X following a suspension by the streamer and other brands after Elon Musk promoted an antisemitic post.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I did not take business classes so limited background but if we assume that the US isn’t going to magically transition away from capitalism, we instead have to find a way to legislate a transition to a more ethical capitalism. That phrase seems to be an oxymoron but for things to not keep getting progressively worse I’m thinking we as a society need to figure out a way to make it happen. Any ideas? You seem to have at least taken a course in the matter.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

What if we transition away from capitalism non-magically?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I mean that’s probably the preferred path but I can’t see how that realistically happens. There are too many individuals globally with too much to lose that will think their loss of capital is worth bringing down the whole human race. I’m sure they would rather see the world in ashes rather than succeed under an alternate system where they may not be on top.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

I think there's a credible case to be made that moving toward socialism has benefits even for the wealthy, and that the change doesn't have to be presented as the end of capitalism.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

No, let's not. Or at least let's change it to something better this time, not worse.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Why don't you take a list of countries by quality of life from some point in the past decade or two, and see which nations seem to always top it.

Spoiler: they're the ones with hybrid economies and highly regulated markets.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, capitalist free-market countries almost exclusively. That's the thing I'd rather not have others break.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Do you not know what a "mixed economy" is? Did you even look at a list? Denmark, Norway, Sweden... You think these are "capitalist free-market countries"and that's why they top the list?

The reason those countries are at the top of the list for quality of life is because they have regulations on their markets, and robust social safety nets.

Maybe actually do a few minutes of honest, open minded research about quality of life.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Did you even look at a list? Denmark, Norway, Sweden… You think these are "capitalist free-market countries"and that’s why they top the list?

Yes, they obviously are capitalist free-market economies.

Perhaps you should read something like https://www.amazon.com/Basic-Economics-Thomas-Sowell/dp/0465060730 before going on with this line of conversation? It should cover most of what you seem to be lacking.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

For fuck sake. I will repeat my question:

Do you not know what a mixed economy is?

Because no, they are not purely "capitalist free market economies." At all.

Perhaps that bit isn't covered in the one book you've read?