you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

He said he is willing to have a discussion about immigration policy with republicans.

"Let's hear the literal fascists who compare even legal immigrants to vermin and invading armies out. I'm sure they'll be willing to reach a reasonable compromise" 🙄

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    You can’t just throw a temper tantrum and expect to get your way. Diplomacy is required to actually get things done.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Who said anything about a temper tantrum? Could you please try and refrain from using ridiculous pro-capitulation strawmen?

    Calmly refusing to negotiate with fascists about one of their favorite "if we give an inch, we're traitors" issues because you know nothing good will come from it isn't having a temper tantrum. It's being realistic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    So you don’t think our politicians should ever be diplomatic or just when on the subject of immigration reform?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    I don't think politicians should grandstand for cheap points about good faith negotiations with domestic terrorists whose re-election depends on negotiating in bad faith or not negotiating at all.

    I wouldn't brag about negotiating with cats about them going vegan either, and that would have a BETTER chance of bearing fruit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    So regardless of the subject you want our government in gridlock and our politicians to not get anything done. Got it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Nope. Please pack your ridiculous strawmen away. You're sounding mighty Republican with your bad faith arguments.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    How is it NOT a strawman to pretend that I ever advocated for government gridlock?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If politicians don’t negotiate across the aisle when majorities in Congress are slim then nothing will get done.

    Did you or did you not imply that Fetterman shouldn’t negotiate?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    I said that nothing good could come from pretending to negotiate immigration with radically anti-immigrant fascists who aren't even PRETENDING to negotiate in good faith.

    Three things can result:

    1. No changes

    2. Changes for the worse and nothing else (by far the most likely)

    3. Tiny changes for the better on one or two very specific things in exchange for massive systemic change for the worse.

    You're pretending that the GOP is a normal and legitimate political party rather than a fundamentally dishonest fascist movement.

    Is your name Neville? Because you're being very Chamberlain right now

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    So again, you’re saying he shouldn’t negotiate with republicans which will result in nothing getting done.

    How is what I said a strawman?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    How is what I said a strawman?

    By inferring that what I want is "nothing getting done", when in reality I've been very clear that what I want is for things to not get worse.

    When you give concessions to fascists, things get worse. STOP pretending that the GOP is a legitimate party operating in good faith.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The GOP as a party supports fascism yes. But individual members of Congress are on a spectrum and can be influenced to vote in our best interests.

    That’s why there are almost always some members that aren’t voting along their party lines. It’s happened like this since the inception of our government.

    That’s why diplomacy is important.

    Just look at how democrats won concessions from the house on the spending bill recently and made republicans look stupid in the process.

    That happened because of diplomacy. Your approach would’ve resulted in a government shutdown instead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    individual [GOP] members of Congress are on a spectrum and can be influenced to vote in our best interests.

    If you truly believe that, I have a mountain chalet in Florida to sell you.

    Name one time since 2016 that anything good came from negotiating with the GOP on immigration. Hell, name one time in this MILLENNIUM.

    there are almost always some members that aren’t voting along their party lines

    Anything even resembling change for the better on immigration being amongst the exceptions that makes your "almost" necessary.

    Just look at how democrats won concessions from the house on the spending bill

    Spending is not the same thing as immigration. While fascists don't like social programs that benefit those who need help, they don't have an automatic visceral fear and hatred of them like they do with immigrants.

    made republicans look stupid in the process.

    As an aside, they were already doing that themselves

    Your approach would’ve resulted in a government shutdown instead.

    No. The Republicans hold the federal government hostage every time raising the debt ceiling comes up. It's as much part of what they do as demagougery in general is.

    Letting them persecute and otherwise abuse immigrants more or less doesn't change that. It just lets them persecute and otherwise abuse immigrants more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The idea is to negotiate in good faith to show that is our stance and not give in to bad faith negotiations.

    If we don’t negotiate at all then there’s no way forward.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If we don’t negotiate at all then there’s no way forward.

    Not true. If your ideas are good enough and you show that you're not too weak and/or corrupt to implement them, you get big enough majorities to bypass the GOP completely, which you should then do.

    It's worse to negotiate in good faith with those that are negotiating in bad faith than to not negotiate at all, since those negotiating in bad faith have no reason to give any concessions and every reason to demand concessions from their opposition.

    Same goes for arguing I'm good faith with people who are either arguing in bad faith or basing their entire argument on a commonly believed false premise.

    So I'm gonna let you go gaslight someone else now. Have the day you deserve.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    You’re ignoring the optics of not negotiating. This is politics. How you present yourself impacts voters’ opinions.

    No one is gaslighting or making strawman arguments or any other psych buzzwords over here.

    You have a good one too. I’m glad the internet allows us to have these conversations because I think it is important to have discorse with people of opposing views.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Because two comments back you literally said it was non negotiable. What the ever fuck do you want to happen?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I didn't say it was non-negotiable, I said that Republicans have no willingness to negotiate in good faith and as such, nothing good comes from pretending that they will.

    Don't misquote me to me. It confirms what I and anyone else reading already suspected: that you're either being dishonest or having trouble understanding plain English.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    This isn't a let's hash out an immigration deal where both sides get a little of what they want regarding immigration reform, it's submitting to hostage takers for an entirely unrelated issue that shouldn't really be partisan.

  • source
  • parent