Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected]
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
https://xkcd.com/2184/
I wonder what the sample size looks like for movies with a score less than 50% pre-2000 vs post-2000.
Writing off an entire century of filmmaking seems like a cop-out
The Way of the Gun (2000), 46% fresh. I really, actually do like this movie. I know, Ryan Phillipe makes things complicated. Like, starting in the first scene with Sarah Silverman.
"There's always cheese at a mousetrap."
The problem that this movie faced was that there was no reward for having a long attention span. Critically panned, the Way of the Gun rewards those who get carried along in the story; those who understand the roles the characters play in each others' lives, the Shakespearean knit in the fabric.
Longbaugh and Parker are Rosencrantz and Guildenstern witnessing the collapse of the house of and unborn Hamlet, whose supposed parents are a mob underboss and his trophy wife. His actual parents are at the shootout where he was born.
This is a good movie. Watch it.
Event Horizon is in the 30s with critics, but higher with audiences. Does it need to be both critics and audience?
I would need to do a lot of searching to find out what movies I like are poorly rated since I don't usually check.
Too easy.
Ninja Assassin is one of my favorite action movies, has a sub-30% score, and I've paid to see it 4 times.
Absolutely fucking love that movie and could not believe it was such a flop. It's balls-out fun from beginning to end
I found a few movies that I genuinely enjoy that make the (or made at the time this was written and I tried it) bottom quartile. Malibu's most wanted and "the crew" are movies I don't skip by (but also never see any more :( ) basically 'organized crime by the inept' movies tickle me the right way
Pootie Tang (2001) is 27% critics, 63% audience. Is that eligible? If so that’s my top-of-my-head pick
I actively like Star Trek Generations (48 on RT). I think it's accessible if you're not a Trek fan, and delightful if you are. A bit campy at times, sure. But it's a human plot dealing with age, death, and change.
I like Generations way more than say, First Contact.
Generations, for all its flaws, was a science fiction story passing the torch from TOS to TNG, and saying something about the characters and world of Star Trek.
First Contact was a generic action-adventure movie wearing a Star Trek uniform.
Honestly, I consider Generations to be the only interesting TNG movie.