▲ 487 ▼ Threads is officially starting to test ActivityPub integration (www.theverge.com) submitted 2 years ago by Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 260 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] sour@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (10 children) threads is centralized permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Zak@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (9 children) If it federates with ActivityPub, it won't be. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago* (8 children) is have all users on one instance permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Zak@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (7 children) The Threads software will still be centralized, but the network won't be. It's a bit like saying outlook.com email is centralized. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (6 children) 141 million users permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Zak@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (5 children) It's big, and that's absolutely a threat from an embrace/extend/extinguish perspective. A big node on a decentralized network is still part of a decentralized network unless they start breaking the decentralization. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (4 children) big node is still centralized permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 4 points 2 years ago* (3 children) And the sky is still blue? Who cares? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (2 children) point of fediverse is decentralization ._. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) All individual nodes are centralized. One of those nodes being big doesn't mean the entire system becomes "centralized." Email is decentralized despite Gmail having the major market share by far. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago is contribute to centralization of whole network permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zak@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (9 children) If it federates with ActivityPub, it won't be. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago* (8 children) is have all users on one instance permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Zak@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (7 children) The Threads software will still be centralized, but the network won't be. It's a bit like saying outlook.com email is centralized. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (6 children) 141 million users permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Zak@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (5 children) It's big, and that's absolutely a threat from an embrace/extend/extinguish perspective. A big node on a decentralized network is still part of a decentralized network unless they start breaking the decentralization. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (4 children) big node is still centralized permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 4 points 2 years ago* (3 children) And the sky is still blue? Who cares? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (2 children) point of fediverse is decentralization ._. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) All individual nodes are centralized. One of those nodes being big doesn't mean the entire system becomes "centralized." Email is decentralized despite Gmail having the major market share by far. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago is contribute to centralization of whole network permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sour@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago* (8 children) is have all users on one instance permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Zak@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (7 children) The Threads software will still be centralized, but the network won't be. It's a bit like saying outlook.com email is centralized. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (6 children) 141 million users permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Zak@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (5 children) It's big, and that's absolutely a threat from an embrace/extend/extinguish perspective. A big node on a decentralized network is still part of a decentralized network unless they start breaking the decentralization. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (4 children) big node is still centralized permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 4 points 2 years ago* (3 children) And the sky is still blue? Who cares? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (2 children) point of fediverse is decentralization ._. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) All individual nodes are centralized. One of those nodes being big doesn't mean the entire system becomes "centralized." Email is decentralized despite Gmail having the major market share by far. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago is contribute to centralization of whole network permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zak@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (7 children) The Threads software will still be centralized, but the network won't be. It's a bit like saying outlook.com email is centralized. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (6 children) 141 million users permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Zak@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (5 children) It's big, and that's absolutely a threat from an embrace/extend/extinguish perspective. A big node on a decentralized network is still part of a decentralized network unless they start breaking the decentralization. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (4 children) big node is still centralized permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 4 points 2 years ago* (3 children) And the sky is still blue? Who cares? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (2 children) point of fediverse is decentralization ._. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) All individual nodes are centralized. One of those nodes being big doesn't mean the entire system becomes "centralized." Email is decentralized despite Gmail having the major market share by far. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago is contribute to centralization of whole network permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sour@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (6 children) 141 million users permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Zak@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (5 children) It's big, and that's absolutely a threat from an embrace/extend/extinguish perspective. A big node on a decentralized network is still part of a decentralized network unless they start breaking the decentralization. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (4 children) big node is still centralized permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 4 points 2 years ago* (3 children) And the sky is still blue? Who cares? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (2 children) point of fediverse is decentralization ._. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) All individual nodes are centralized. One of those nodes being big doesn't mean the entire system becomes "centralized." Email is decentralized despite Gmail having the major market share by far. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago is contribute to centralization of whole network permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zak@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (5 children) It's big, and that's absolutely a threat from an embrace/extend/extinguish perspective. A big node on a decentralized network is still part of a decentralized network unless they start breaking the decentralization. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (4 children) big node is still centralized permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 4 points 2 years ago* (3 children) And the sky is still blue? Who cares? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (2 children) point of fediverse is decentralization ._. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) All individual nodes are centralized. One of those nodes being big doesn't mean the entire system becomes "centralized." Email is decentralized despite Gmail having the major market share by far. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago is contribute to centralization of whole network permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (4 children) big node is still centralized permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 4 points 2 years ago* (3 children) And the sky is still blue? Who cares? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (2 children) point of fediverse is decentralization ._. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) All individual nodes are centralized. One of those nodes being big doesn't mean the entire system becomes "centralized." Email is decentralized despite Gmail having the major market share by far. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago is contribute to centralization of whole network permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 4 points 2 years ago* (3 children) And the sky is still blue? Who cares? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (2 children) point of fediverse is decentralization ._. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) All individual nodes are centralized. One of those nodes being big doesn't mean the entire system becomes "centralized." Email is decentralized despite Gmail having the major market share by far. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago is contribute to centralization of whole network permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sour@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (2 children) point of fediverse is decentralization ._. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) All individual nodes are centralized. One of those nodes being big doesn't mean the entire system becomes "centralized." Email is decentralized despite Gmail having the major market share by far. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago is contribute to centralization of whole network permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) All individual nodes are centralized. One of those nodes being big doesn't mean the entire system becomes "centralized." Email is decentralized despite Gmail having the major market share by far. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago is contribute to centralization of whole network permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sour@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago is contribute to centralization of whole network permalink fedilink source parent