▲ 487 ▼ Threads is officially starting to test ActivityPub integration (www.theverge.com) submitted 2 years ago by Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 260 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] sour@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (6 children) 141 million users permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Zak@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (5 children) It's big, and that's absolutely a threat from an embrace/extend/extinguish perspective. A big node on a decentralized network is still part of a decentralized network unless they start breaking the decentralization. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (4 children) big node is still centralized permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 4 points 2 years ago* (3 children) And the sky is still blue? Who cares? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (2 children) point of fediverse is decentralization ._. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) All individual nodes are centralized. One of those nodes being big doesn't mean the entire system becomes "centralized." Email is decentralized despite Gmail having the major market share by far. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago is contribute to centralization of whole network permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zak@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (5 children) It's big, and that's absolutely a threat from an embrace/extend/extinguish perspective. A big node on a decentralized network is still part of a decentralized network unless they start breaking the decentralization. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (4 children) big node is still centralized permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 4 points 2 years ago* (3 children) And the sky is still blue? Who cares? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (2 children) point of fediverse is decentralization ._. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) All individual nodes are centralized. One of those nodes being big doesn't mean the entire system becomes "centralized." Email is decentralized despite Gmail having the major market share by far. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago is contribute to centralization of whole network permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sour@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (4 children) big node is still centralized permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 4 points 2 years ago* (3 children) And the sky is still blue? Who cares? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (2 children) point of fediverse is decentralization ._. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) All individual nodes are centralized. One of those nodes being big doesn't mean the entire system becomes "centralized." Email is decentralized despite Gmail having the major market share by far. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago is contribute to centralization of whole network permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 4 points 2 years ago* (3 children) And the sky is still blue? Who cares? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sour@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (2 children) point of fediverse is decentralization ._. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) All individual nodes are centralized. One of those nodes being big doesn't mean the entire system becomes "centralized." Email is decentralized despite Gmail having the major market share by far. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago is contribute to centralization of whole network permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sour@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (2 children) point of fediverse is decentralization ._. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) All individual nodes are centralized. One of those nodes being big doesn't mean the entire system becomes "centralized." Email is decentralized despite Gmail having the major market share by far. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago is contribute to centralization of whole network permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) All individual nodes are centralized. One of those nodes being big doesn't mean the entire system becomes "centralized." Email is decentralized despite Gmail having the major market share by far. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sour@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago is contribute to centralization of whole network permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sour@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago is contribute to centralization of whole network permalink fedilink source parent