this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
567 points (97.5% liked)

Games

16403 readers
1813 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
567
Twitch will now allow "Artistic Nudity" following the viral topless meta (www.dexerto.com)
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
360 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Twitch Updated their Sexual Content Policy:

  • Changes: Certain content now allowed with labels
  • Artistic Nudity: Permitted under Sexual Themes Label
  • Game Nudity: Contextual; labels necessary
  • Body Painting: Acceptable with appropriate label
  • Mature Games: Label generally covers content
  • Stream Visibility: Impacted by content labels
  • Twerking, grinding and pole dancing are now allowed without a label.

Via https://twitter.com/Dexerto/status/1735024184114245689

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 31 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children)

I’m kinda surprised there’s no NSFW version of Twitch tbh, I’d imagine it would be the easiest pile of money if they could capitalize on how much porn these Twitch gals are doing as a separate brand or something.

EDIT: Should clarify, I meant an Amazon-owned NSFW Twitch using Twitch branding. I know cam sites exist and also got lucky on Omegle a few times.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Cam girl sites have been around for decades now..

[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But then the streamers would have to compete with thousands of other actual sex workers. Making it harder to stand out.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

Exactly. The twitch thot meta is entirely successful because they don't have to compete with people posting actual porn, and that they aren't posting on a porn site such that it's less likely to be restricted, and gets full publicity

[–] [email protected] 22 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Twitch is Amazon. They should just buy Chaturbate

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Imagine the sign-in page:

⬛ Create an account

✅ Fuck it, use my Twitch account

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

Fuck yeah I'm using my twitch account. Because you know that there are going to be drops-enabled streams

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

Token discounts and drops with prime membership

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I think it has to do with the fact that some investors, payment providers and banks refuse to associate with anything that could be seen as sex work. That was why even OnlyFans was about to ban sexually explicit content 2 years ago.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Twitch: After Dark

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Sexy Twitch

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

Isn’t that just kinda cam sites though?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Yes, the clearest way would be to launch a separate “Twitch 18+” or smg, offer integration of accounts for users and content creators, and go ahead. But they don’t actually want to do that, they want to blur the line, capitalize on the thirst of the audiance, without fully committing to the idea for PR reasons.