217
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

if asked by a user prompts chatGPT to summarize a copyrighted book, it will do so.

So will a human. Let's stop extending copyright law. Also, how you know it read the book, and not a summary of it, of which there are loads on the internet?

[-] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago

This is why I am pro AI art. It’s no different than a human taking inspiration from other work.

Nobody comes up with anything truly original. It’s all inspired by someone before them.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 2 years ago

I don’t know how anyone is pro AI anything other than the pigs making money from it. Only bad can result of it. And will.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 2 years ago

I don’t know how anyone can be anti AI.

It’s just a tool. To say that only bad can result of it is a bold claim that doesn’t make any sense.

Can you provide an example?

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

Just wait and see.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
217 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

39834 readers
240 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS