▲ 204 ▼ 23andMe frantically changed its terms of service to prevent hacked customers from suing (www.engadget.com) submitted 2 years ago by SeaJ@lemm.ee to c/news@lemmy.world 12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] A_Porcupine@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Diotima@kbin.social 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Except that's not true. Somehow, 23andme missed the almost certainly anomalous activity on thier network that lead to the extraction of 6.9 million users' data. Missing the activity associated with the massive data dump, designing thier system to allow for that? 100% thier fault. One should not be able to use a set of hacked accounts to dump that much data. That's a design flaw. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SeaJ@lemm.ee [S] 6 points 2 years ago As someone in that data breach (not from reused passwords) and of Jewish descent (the seeming target of the hack), I'm going to say it is not blown out of proportion. They previously had no limits on failed login attempts which is pathetic from a security standpoint. They still don't require 2FA. They say they courage it but it's not like they bug you about it. So they failed at multiple points prior to the hack and still fail after. They do have a limit on failed logins now so they have done part off the base level of security. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Diotima@kbin.social 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) Except that's not true. Somehow, 23andme missed the almost certainly anomalous activity on thier network that lead to the extraction of 6.9 million users' data. Missing the activity associated with the massive data dump, designing thier system to allow for that? 100% thier fault. One should not be able to use a set of hacked accounts to dump that much data. That's a design flaw. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee [S] 6 points 2 years ago As someone in that data breach (not from reused passwords) and of Jewish descent (the seeming target of the hack), I'm going to say it is not blown out of proportion. They previously had no limits on failed login attempts which is pathetic from a security standpoint. They still don't require 2FA. They say they courage it but it's not like they bug you about it. So they failed at multiple points prior to the hack and still fail after. They do have a limit on failed logins now so they have done part off the base level of security. permalink fedilink source parent