Technology

59299 readers

6928 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

297

The FTC is reportedly looking into Microsoft’s $13 billion OpenAI investment (www.engadget.com)

submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 37 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

My article is from 3 days ago. When was your source in Wikipedia from?

EDIT: From your own source

The FTC formally withdrew its challenge to the acquisition on July 20, 2023, though they have announced their intent to refile at a later time.[78] The FTC reopened its case against the merger on September 27, 2023, though was unable to block the merger from occurring.[79]

So they withdrew their challenge in July and stated they would refile. They did refile in September, and are currently appealing a decision to allow the merger by a judge as of Dec 6th.

The FTC has been actively fighting this merger every step of the way and has yet to stop.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The deal has already closed. I wish them luck.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It's not fully "closed," no matter what Microsoft claims. Its been approved by a lower court judge, and the FTC are currently appealing that judgement.

Fighting the merger in court 3 separate times sure is different than "letting Microsoft buy Activision" though, isn't it?