this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
15 points (89.5% liked)

Selfhosted

39964 readers
403 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
15
Defeated by NGINX (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Heads up! Long post and lots of head bashing against the wall.

Context:

I have a written an a python app (Django). I have dockerized the deployment and the compose file has three containers, app, nginx and postgres. I'm currently trying to deploy a demo of it in a VPS running Debian 11. Information below has been redacted (IPs, Domain name, etc.)

Problem:

I keep running into 502 errors. Locally things work very well even with nginx (but running on 80). As I try to deploy this I'm trying to configure nginx the best I can and redirecting http traffic to https and ssl certs. The nginx logs simply say "connect() failed (111: Connection refused) while connecting to upstream, client: 1.2.3.4, server: demo.example.com, request: "GET / HTTP/1.1", upstream: "http://192.168.0.2:8020/", host: "demo.example.com"". I have tried just about everything.

What I've tried:

  • Adding my server block configs to /etc/nginx/conf.d/default.conf
  • Adding my server block configs to a new file in /etc/nginx/conf.d/app.conf and leaving default at out of box config.
  • Tried putting the above config (default.conf and app.conf) in sites-available (/etc/nginx/sites-available/* not at the same time tho).
  • Recreated /etc/nginx/nginx.conf by copy/pasting out of box nginx.conf and then adding server blocks directly in nginx.conf
  • Running nginx -t inside of the nginx container (Syntax and config were "successful")
  • Running nginx -T when recreated /etc/nginx/nginx.conf
    • nginx -T when the server blocks where in /etc/nginx/conf.d/* lead me to think that since there were two server listen 80 blocks that I should ensure only one listen 80 block was being read by the container hence the recreated /etc/nginx/nginx.conf from above
  • Restarted container each time a change was made.
  • Changed the user block from nginx (no dice when using nginx as user) to www-data, root and nobody
  • Deleted my entire docker data and redeployed everything a few times.
  • Double checked the upstream block 1,000 times
  • Confirmed upstream block container is running and on the right exposed port Checked access.log and error.log but they were both empty (not sure why, tried cat and tail)
  • Probably forgetting more stuff (6 hours deep in the same error loop by now)

How can you help:

Please take a look at the nginx.conf config below and see if you guys can spot a problem, PLEASE! This is my current /etc/nginx/nginx.conf

`

user www-data;

worker_processes auto;

error_log /var/log/nginx/error.log notice; pid /var/run/nginx.pid;

events { worker_connections 1024; }

http { include /etc/nginx/mime.types; default_type application/octet-stream;

log_format  main  '$remote_addr - $remote_user [$time_local] "$request" '
                  '$status $body_bytes_sent "$http_referer" '
                  '"$http_user_agent" "$http_x_forwarded_for"';

access_log  /var/log/nginx/access.log  main;

sendfile        on;
#tcp_nopush     on;

keepalive_timeout  65;

#gzip  on;

upstream djangoapp {
    server app:8020;
}

server {
    listen 80;
    listen [::]:80;
    server_name demo.example.com;

    return 301 https://$host$request_uri;
}

server {
    listen 443 ssl;
    listen [::]:443 ssl;

    server_name demo.example.com;

    ssl_certificate /etc/letsencrypt/live/demo.example.com/fullchain.pem;
    ssl_certificate_key /etc/letsencrypt/live/demo.example.com/privkey.pem;
    #ssl_protocols TLSv1.2 TLSv1.3;
    #ssl_prefer_server_ciphers on;

    location / {
        proxy_pass http://djangoapp;
        proxy_set_header Host $host;
        proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr;
        proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme;
        proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
        #proxy_set_header Upgrade $http_upgrade;
        #proxy_set_header Connection keep-alive;
        proxy_redirect off;
    }

    location /static/ {
        autoindex on;
        alias /static/;
    }
}

}

`

  • EDIT: I have also confirmed that both containers are connected to the same docker network (docker network inspect frontend)

  • EDIT 2: Solved my problem. See my comments to @chaospatterns. TLDR there was an uncaught exception in the app but it didn’t cause a crash with the container. Had to dig deep into logs to find it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
  1. 192.168.0.3 is the IP of the django app container (checked with docker inspect app | grep IP and docker logs nginx which shows blah blah upstream http://192.168.0.2:8020 blah blah)
  2. I created a "frontend" network. This nginx and app container are both connected to this network but only nginx has the forwarding (0.0.0.0:80 and 0.0.0.0:443). The app container is set to EXPOSE 8020 in the Dockerfile and docker compose and the entrypoint.sh has this line after the usual django commands gunicorn app.wsgi:application --user www-data --bind 0.0.0.0:8020 --workers 3.

SOLVED.. ALMOST THERE??? There were no signs (docker logs app) of an issue, until I scrolled all the way to the very top (way past all the successful migrations, tasks being run upon boot and successful messages). There was an uncaught exception to boot gunicorn workers because of middleware I had removed from my dependencies a few days ago. Searched through my code, removed any calls and settings for this middleware package. Redeployed the app and now I can hit the public page.

What now? So now that it looks like everything is working. What is the best practice for the nginx.conf? Leave it all in /etc/nginx/nginx.conf (with user as root), reestablish the out box nginx.conf and /etc/nginx/conf.d/default.conf and just override the default.conf or add a secondary config like /etc/nginx/conf.d/app.conf and leave default.conf as configured out of box? What is the best practice around this?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There was an uncaught exception to boot gunicorn workers

That's odd that it didn't cause the Docker container to immediately exit.

What now? So now that it looks like everything is working. What is the best practice for the nginx.conf? Leave it all in /etc/nginx/nginx.conf (with user as root), reestablish the out box nginx.conf and /etc/nginx/conf.d/default.conf

My suggestion would be to create /etc/nginx/conf.d/mycooldjangoapp.conf. Compared to conf.d/default.conf, this is more intuitive if you start hosting multiple apps. Keep it out of the nginx.conf because apt-get or other package managers will usually patch that with new version changes and again it gets confusing if you have multiple apps.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yea not sure why it didn’t just crash and hid behind all kinds of successful messages.

Fair enough! If I create a secondary config as you are suggesting, wouldn’t it create a conflict with the server blocks of default.conf? If I remember correctly, default.conf has a server listen 80 block going to localhost (which in my case wouldn’t be the correct path since the app is in another container) so wouldn’t nginx get confused because it doesn’t know which block to follow???

Or maybe I saw the block in default.conf but it was all commented it out out of the box. Idk I had to step away for a sec. As you can imagine I’ve been bashing my head for hours and it turned out to be some bs I should have probably read the entire log stream. So I’m pretty angry/decompressing at the moment.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If I create a secondary config as you are suggesting, wouldn’t it create a conflict with the server blocks of default.conf

No, you can have multiple server blocks with the same listen directive. They just need to differ by their server_name and only one server block can contain default_server; Reference

NGINX will use the server_name directives to differentiate the different backend services. This is a class virtual host configuration model.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Alright I’ll give it a try and see what happens. Thanks for your help!