this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Solarpunk Travel

641 readers
2 users here now

Community for those focused on sustainable travel. Our society's current levels of energy intensive and frequent travel are not compatible with life on a finite planet. We advocate for long-term slow travel to see the world, and low energy local travel to deeply experience your community. Green washing free zone.

related to sustainable travel:

related to travel generally:

The communities listed above are decentralized. Centralized instances are omitted as they go against the fedi purpose and it’s better to cultivate digital rights in the free world. That means instances that have a disproportionately large population or are centralized on Cloudflare are not listed.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Ebikes + renewable energy is more efficient even than a human riding a traditional bike! The energy has to come from somewhere.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why should regular bikes use more energy, given they're only manufactured once (as are bikes), have no degenerating batteries and don't need electricity are less efficient than ebikes?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't think this is true. Ebikes are actually not very sustainable: https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com/2023/02/can-we-make-bicycles-sustainable-again/

But if it replaces a car, it is still very nice!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's strange that they didn't include the food offset by the ebike though. This link tries to give a comparison between the two accounting for a typical European diet (which is also far more sustainable than the typical American diet).

https://www.bikeradar.com/features/long-reads/cycling-environmental-impact/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I think it is reasonable to ignore food, since it will be more or less equal to the energy you would spend exercising in other ways (jogging, gym, ...). Especially when commiting in a city (<10km).

But your link still shows a nice overview when taking that into account specifically!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, doesn't quite make sense unless it's implying that it's within the average lifespan of the vehicle. Maybe then you can get further on an eBike than you can on an equivalent regular bike before it falls apart?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doubtful, given that it is much more sustainable replacing cogs and chain wheels only than to also replace the motor...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But you also pedal way less on an eBike. Not sure if it's enough to offset that though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You mean while putting more force on cogs and chain?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Does it though?

Edit: Yes it does:

"Because of the added weight and torque, e-bike systems do produce more wear and tear on “consumable” parts. You’ll likely have to replace things like chains and brake pads more frequently, and you'll want to keep an eye on tire wear and wheel parts like spokes, which are under more stress from the torque of the motor."

So yeah, no clue how they got to the conclusion that eBikes are more energy efficient than regular bikes.