Asklemmy

43858 readers

1594 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

You must pick a point in human history before the 1950s to be spend the rest of your life in. What era and place would you choose? (lemmy.blahaj.zone)

submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

124 comments fedilink hide all child comments

You would still have the same age, gender, personality, skin color, etc. and you would be able to speak at least one local language and would know basic information of the era and place. Your family, social standing, and such would be randomly picked.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The location, geography and placement is randomly picked?

Then like the other guy said December 31, 1949 11:59 pm

To be born before this time randomly anywhere in the world means that there is a high chance you'd be dropped into an impoverished hell hole with nothing, no chance and no help .... God help you if you are female.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I have a whole rant on this topic, but the short version:

It’s dentists.

The gnarliest mountain man, who hunts bears with his bear hands, can be brought to his knees with a toothache. The toothache never sleeps, can’t be fought, and always eventually wins. Even basic dentistry is life saving - even another human with a pair of pliers and some moonshine - but I’d much rather have novocaine.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Dental problems a hundred years ago were not as problematic as we think. I'm Indigenous Canadian and my parents were born and raised in the bush and judging from family photos I've seen from a hundred years ago ... most people had decent teeth. I have photos of my grandmothers parents who must have been in the 60s or 70s and they all had full teeth, probably not the best but they had obvious white teeth.

Cavities and tooth problems are a modern problem from wealth .. we eat too much starch and sugar and generally just eat way too much of everything. Before the modern era, up to about the mid 1800s, the average person ate about five pounds of refined sugar a year - today the average person consumes about 100 lbs of sugar a year. ... and those are the averages! Back a hundred years ago, you were wealthy if you could get sugar ... most people just couldn't afford to eat it .. most people couldn't afford to eat! And they ate more simple diets and less often.

The biggest fear I have about going back to the past is just getting a flesh wound, a hang nail or a scratch that could fester into an infection and either take a limb or kill me.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

Dental problems aren't about them looking good; teeth used to kill. Dental disease used to be the 5th leading cause of death. Your great-grandparents aren't the best bar for dentistry in the past as modern dentistry began in the 18th century.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

You can pick the place too.