this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
889 points (96.8% liked)

memes

10334 readers
1855 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 133 points 11 months ago (29 children)

They could easily use the proper units, but sometime someone decided to cheat and now everyone does to the point that this is the standard now.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Indeed, Windows could easily stop mislabeling TiB as TB, but it seems it's too hard for them.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

The IEC changing the definition of 1KB from 1024 bytes to 1000 bytes was a terrible idea that's given us this whole mess. Sure, it's nice and consistent with scientific prefix now... except it's far from consistent in actual usage. So many things still consider it binary prefix following the JEDEC standard. Like KiB that's always 1024 bytes, I really think they should've introduced another new unambiguous unit eg. KoB that's always 1000 bytes and deprecated the poorly defined KB altogether

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

M stands for Mega, a SI prefix that existed longer than the computer data that is being labeled. MB being 1000000 bytes was always the correct definition, it's just that someone decided that they could somehow change it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Consistency with proper scientific prefix is nice to have, but consistency within the computing industry itself is really important, and now we have neither. In this industry, binary calculations were centric, and powers of 2 were much more useful. They really should've picked a different prefix to begin with, yes. However, for the IEC correcting it retroactively, this has failed. It's a mess that's far from actually standardised now

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

B and b have never been SI units. Closest is Bq. So if people had not been insisting that it's confusing noone would've been confused.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

does not mean you can misuse SI prefixes if the unit itself is not part of the system.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)