this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
-24 points (30.6% liked)

Conservative

247 readers
2 users here now

We are a community dedicated to discussion surrounding the political right.

People of all political views are welcome here, but we expect a high level of discussion from everyone.

Rules:
-Good Faith participation only. take hollow shit slinging elsewhere please
-Stay on topic. should be obvious
-Follow instance rules. They pay the bills, they get to set rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

but the Judge here is making things much more complicated than they ought to be.

How so? Is it not reasonable to enforce that ballot measures must be specific and not just a ton of stuff all bundled into a big all-or-nothing vote?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What's illegal is different from what's reasonable. I'm going to have to find the judge's opinion, but the article doesn't really give any reasons why it's illegal.

Congress passes all sorts of these big bundles of law all the time

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You seriously see no problem with just putting massive bundles of issues on a purely binary yes/no vote with no room for anything to be changed or removed?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Then vote it down

Actually, now that I read the damn article again, it seems like there's a single subject rule in Nevada. That's the crux of the issue.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Yes. That was the entire point. What have you been talking about this whole time