Passengers who booked trips have been told refunds will be issued in monthly installments

...

Life at Sea Cruises' first three-year sailing was announced in March and promised passengers willing to fork out at least $29,999 per year

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 16 points 2 years ago (9 children)

Not my idea of a good time either but it was appealing to some people. Cruises are incredibly popular. I'd only go if it were free and I was unable to sell the ticket(s).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I don't think I'd go if it were free. I have other things - productive things I could be doing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    But you’d still go? Like… if I bought you a ticket on a shitty cruise, you’d go just because you have to use up free things?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Who’s saying no to a free holiday? I went away this year for the first time in a decade and it was heavenly. I’d never chose to go on a cruise, but I’d jump at the chance for a new experience, some sun and relaxation - especially over winter when I having to chose between heating and eating ffs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments