you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -16 points 2 years ago (31 children)

You never did it, but still made money for claiming that you had?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 31 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (24 children)

    I'd : contraction I + had, past participle active. Indicative of something having been done by the subject (in first person) in the past.

    "I did something I had never done (before / in the past).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 2 years ago (23 children)
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (9 children)
  • [+] -11 points 2 years ago (8 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    Looks like everyone but you understood it correctly - maybe you should brush up on your language comprehension skills?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Maybe y'all could try having a sense of humor about things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Wrongly calling someone out while being too fragile to accept correction isn't a "sense of humor".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I'm not the one too fragile to accept correction.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)

    #SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world

    You never did it, but still made money for claiming that you had?

    #Null@pawb.social

    I'd: contraction I + had, past participle active. Indicative of something having been done by the subject (in first person) in the past.

    "I did something I had never done (before / in the past).

    #SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world

    "Before" is not implied.

    Uh, it's right there. So yeah, you clearly are. Right here in this very thread.

    Okay, nooow I'm blocking the troll...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I don't know what you think you proved. I've never met anyone as obtuse as you before.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (12 children)

    Take an English class, I'm sure YouTube has a good video explaining it (basically there are different "degrees" of past tense, did / had done etc.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    It's still not implicit just because you inferred it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Well the word "before" doesn't need to implicit. The "had" in I'd is more than enough past for the sentence to make sense

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    No, that simply indicated that they had not done the thing, i.e. at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (4 children)
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    No, they never said "before."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    For someone who only posts insulting others and correcting (incorrectly a bunch too….) their grammar, you sure lack any amount of reading comprehension.

    Its always the loudest people who are the most guilty, I appreciate the lengths you go to prove this is still true.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    @SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world I see a lot of toxic behaviour from you here and I will be keeping a closer eye on you in the future.

    As you @schmidtster@lemmy.world try not to bring disputes started in other comment chains into this one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago*

    I’ve tried just reporting them before. Doesn’t seem to do anything, so sorry for having to point it out. See this person all over Lemmy in lots of communities.

    And just had an interaction yesterday, so had to see what was new with them. Again, my apologies for bringing this to your attention, wasn’t bringing an argument in.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)

    In the English language, an action I "had done" is before an action I "did." It's a grammatical case, not an inference.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    He stated that he had not done it, not that he had not done it before.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Must be a government contract

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    I did do this for web dev for a government contract. I got brought on for mobile optimizations but ended up doing full UI/UX design and marketing copy with no experience. All through their shitty in house WYSIWYG. $60/hr for a full year lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    In IT contracting (at least the fields I'm around) it's quite common that "being able to acquire new skills quickly" is one of the skills you get paid for, and the time needed for you to do that is accounted for in the project planning.

  • source
  • parent