▲ 717 ▼ Things that would usually work in a romcom (startrek.website) submitted 2 years ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@startrek.website to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world 48 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] enki@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago (2 children) Sure, we'll just delete some of the land in North America so everyone can live closer together. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] jose1324@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (3 children) China can make high speed rail. And it's not a small country permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 12 points 2 years ago America was built by train too to be fair permalink fedilink source parent [–] enki@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago China has high speed rail in its eastern most populated section, with a single line running to the entire western half of the country, and similarly sparse lines to the north. The dense population centers in the US are not all in one area, they are spread across the continent interspersed with large swaths of rural land. That being said the US is working on high speed rail, and we've had passenger trains that cross the entire country for nearly two centuries - see Amtrak, as well as bus services like Greyhound. As much as I hate to break up a circle jerk, the US is about as good at this as any other western country, and it's doing it across an entire sparsely populated continent, not small, highly dense European countries. permalink fedilink source parent [+] letsgo@lemm.ee -4 points 2 years ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Chetzemoka@startrek.website 10 points 2 years ago We've should have nationalized high speed rail the same way we have a nationalized interstate highway system. Not everything needs to be privatized for profit. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 years ago The US has a concept of eminent domain, which it has used in the past to build fairly fast affordable rail (and highways). There's no reason it can't work today except the fact our politicians are owned by car lobbiests. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* When they put up highways, they very *very" often bulldozed through poor black neighborhoods. They didn't care. I don't suggest we start doing that again, but the US had and has the capability to build out a fantastic trail system, but the highway system is lobbied for hard by car manufacturers. AMTRAK gets like an eighth of the federal funding that roads get. permalink fedilink source parent [–] puppy@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* How profitable are highways? permalink fedilink source parent [–] puppy@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) I didn't know that when highways were built land was deleted so everyone could live closer together. I mean if we can delete it once, why not for the second time amirite? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] enki@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago* The only way for there never to be long trips in a country that spans the width of an entire continent would be to condense every one into a much smaller area. So you either abandon land in 2/3rds of the country, or you figure out how to magically drop away the land in between large metro areas. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jose1324@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (3 children) China can make high speed rail. And it's not a small country permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 12 points 2 years ago America was built by train too to be fair permalink fedilink source parent [–] enki@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago China has high speed rail in its eastern most populated section, with a single line running to the entire western half of the country, and similarly sparse lines to the north. The dense population centers in the US are not all in one area, they are spread across the continent interspersed with large swaths of rural land. That being said the US is working on high speed rail, and we've had passenger trains that cross the entire country for nearly two centuries - see Amtrak, as well as bus services like Greyhound. As much as I hate to break up a circle jerk, the US is about as good at this as any other western country, and it's doing it across an entire sparsely populated continent, not small, highly dense European countries. permalink fedilink source parent [+] letsgo@lemm.ee -4 points 2 years ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Chetzemoka@startrek.website 10 points 2 years ago We've should have nationalized high speed rail the same way we have a nationalized interstate highway system. Not everything needs to be privatized for profit. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 years ago The US has a concept of eminent domain, which it has used in the past to build fairly fast affordable rail (and highways). There's no reason it can't work today except the fact our politicians are owned by car lobbiests. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* When they put up highways, they very *very" often bulldozed through poor black neighborhoods. They didn't care. I don't suggest we start doing that again, but the US had and has the capability to build out a fantastic trail system, but the highway system is lobbied for hard by car manufacturers. AMTRAK gets like an eighth of the federal funding that roads get. permalink fedilink source parent [–] puppy@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* How profitable are highways? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 12 points 2 years ago America was built by train too to be fair permalink fedilink source parent
[–] enki@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago China has high speed rail in its eastern most populated section, with a single line running to the entire western half of the country, and similarly sparse lines to the north. The dense population centers in the US are not all in one area, they are spread across the continent interspersed with large swaths of rural land. That being said the US is working on high speed rail, and we've had passenger trains that cross the entire country for nearly two centuries - see Amtrak, as well as bus services like Greyhound. As much as I hate to break up a circle jerk, the US is about as good at this as any other western country, and it's doing it across an entire sparsely populated continent, not small, highly dense European countries. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] letsgo@lemm.ee -4 points 2 years ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Chetzemoka@startrek.website 10 points 2 years ago We've should have nationalized high speed rail the same way we have a nationalized interstate highway system. Not everything needs to be privatized for profit. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 years ago The US has a concept of eminent domain, which it has used in the past to build fairly fast affordable rail (and highways). There's no reason it can't work today except the fact our politicians are owned by car lobbiests. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* When they put up highways, they very *very" often bulldozed through poor black neighborhoods. They didn't care. I don't suggest we start doing that again, but the US had and has the capability to build out a fantastic trail system, but the highway system is lobbied for hard by car manufacturers. AMTRAK gets like an eighth of the federal funding that roads get. permalink fedilink source parent [–] puppy@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* How profitable are highways? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Chetzemoka@startrek.website 10 points 2 years ago We've should have nationalized high speed rail the same way we have a nationalized interstate highway system. Not everything needs to be privatized for profit. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 years ago The US has a concept of eminent domain, which it has used in the past to build fairly fast affordable rail (and highways). There's no reason it can't work today except the fact our politicians are owned by car lobbiests. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* When they put up highways, they very *very" often bulldozed through poor black neighborhoods. They didn't care. I don't suggest we start doing that again, but the US had and has the capability to build out a fantastic trail system, but the highway system is lobbied for hard by car manufacturers. AMTRAK gets like an eighth of the federal funding that roads get. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] puppy@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago* How profitable are highways? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] puppy@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 child) I didn't know that when highways were built land was deleted so everyone could live closer together. I mean if we can delete it once, why not for the second time amirite? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] enki@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago* The only way for there never to be long trips in a country that spans the width of an entire continent would be to condense every one into a much smaller area. So you either abandon land in 2/3rds of the country, or you figure out how to magically drop away the land in between large metro areas. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] enki@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago* The only way for there never to be long trips in a country that spans the width of an entire continent would be to condense every one into a much smaller area. So you either abandon land in 2/3rds of the country, or you figure out how to magically drop away the land in between large metro areas. permalink fedilink source parent