Risa

6912 readers

143 users here now

Star Trek memes and shitposts

Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

288

Crystals good, fungus bad (i.imgur.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

109 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

but for something fairly simple like that? Nah, the show is just bad.

Ok, why was the ship erased from the records? Why did it have to go into the future? What was the sphere thing again? How were Discovery going into the future again ... couldn't they have just sent the important thing separately? Does Discovery going into the future and being "erased" actually prevent the problem ... which was what ... AI?!

Honestly, I don't know the answer to all of those questions. And as much as I personally liked the idea of doing Trek 900 years in the future (finally, something new in trek), I remember the plot of the backend of season 2 being just a bit too much "what? really?".

I can't break it down, like at all, but I'm personally not convinced at all that Discovery needing to be erased made much sense. Convince me otherwise, please. But also, to anyone else ... do you honestly remember why Discovery had to go into the future and be "erased" ... and even if you do ... does it feel like a good or interesting story point to you? If you answer with at least one "no", then the whole "erased" thing just isn't a good explanation or defence for why the spore drive in a prequel is somewhere between bad and awkward.

Personally, I'd go further and say the whole "erased" thing cant be anything other than contrived ... because it's simultaneously so extreme and completely necessary to handle the issue of the spore drive ... they had to do something like this and it's just too hard to not think about the writers trying to work their way out of the problem. That their reason for needing to be erased and go into the future doesn't seem to have any connection to Discovery or its spore drive, but just happens to have struck the same ship with a spore drive and no other ship, only affirms the contrivance.

Maybe I'm missing something here, it's been a while since I've season 2. But the "erased from the records" plot point might just be a part of the problem we're citing here, not a defence against.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

do you honestly remember why Discovery had to go into the future and be “erased"

It was to ensure there was no way for Control (which they were not certain had been eliminated) or anyone else to get hold of the sentient sphere data in their possession. I admit the episodes are a little muddled, but it seemed like the original "Perpetual Infinity" plan had been to go into the wormhole and never emerge, which isn't exactly what happened in the end.

and even if you do … does it feel like a good or interesting story point to you?

Absolutely, I think the 32nd Century is pretty great, and the time jump was the means to that end.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Absolutely, I think the 32nd Century is pretty great, and the time jump was the means to that end.

Oh I’m all for the jump! Just not sure the justification for it makes much sense. Was the sphere sentient by that point?

They couldn’t just destroy Discovery? Or spore drive the ship far away?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Was the sphere sentient by that point?

By that point, the sphere was actively resisting attempts to tamper with it or delete or destroy it, though it doesn't appear to have developed a personality.

They couldn’t just destroy Discovery?

They tried, in "Such Sweet Sorrow" - the sphere disabled the auto-destruct and raised shields, preventing the Enterprise from firing at Discovery.

Or spore drive the ship far away?

I believe they discussed this as a possibility in "Perpetual Infinity" - IIRC, their conclusion was that it was too risky to bring the sphere data anywhere, which was why their original plan was to "merge it into the river of time" (which, to me, suggests they never actually intended to leave the wormhole.

I don't personally think the climax of season 2 is very good or clearly-written, but there are explanations provided for a number of things.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’d personally completely forgotten about the river of time stuff and the intention to never emerge. Though wasn’t there stuff also about Michael setting a beacon in the future? Also, in season 3 they seemed unsurprised at emerging in the future IIRC.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’d personally completely forgotten about the river of time stuff and the intention to never emerge.

I freely admit that this probably falls under the category of "personal interpretation" - here's the exchange that makes me think that (without identifying who's speaking, because the site I found doesn't provide that info):

Instead of fighting time, we go with it.

Stop trying to destroy the Sphere.

Merge it into the river of time.

Send it so far into the future, it can't do us any harm? I collected sensor data from Dr. Burnham when she first arrived.

The Red Angel suit has almost limitless quantum computational power. Literally infinite storage.

Meaning you can transfer the Sphere archive into the suit, program a destination beyond Dr. Burnham's anchor point and let the wormhole take it forever? Perpetual infinity.

Control will never get the data in order to evolve.

However, I don't think this idea is ever really acknowledged after this conversation, and like you said, Burnham seems thrilled when she arrives in the future in season 3, so maybe I'm way off.