this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
278 points (90.2% liked)

linuxmemes

21251 readers
1439 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     

    Edit: typo

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    How is it whenever I see a post about 'what anti virus should I use' people are always saying 'just use defender - def don't use avast!'

    [–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago

    Because if you're gonna use an antivirus, Defender does just fine.

    They all more or less use the same viral signature database and definitions, and are mostly feature-matched with each other. Why look beyond what your computer came with unless you're installing something integrated with an RMM tool?

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

    Because, in addition to the other valid points raised, modern "Anti"-Virus Software is often worse than an actual Virus.

    There are way too many pop ups, the menus are confusing and constantly try to upsell you. If you want to remove the damn thing usually it doesn't work, or doesn't work completely, or has a separate auto-updater that reinstalls it after the next boot.

    False positives screw you over good (Kaspersky killed the Ethernet Network on a buddy's PC. He couldn't use the internet on it until he managed to remove that piece of shit from his system completey) and are not less frequent than with Windows Defender but certainly more annoying (see above example)

    If you paid a subscription getting rid of that is a pain as well (BitDefender tried to scam me out of 130€ by sending the billing notif to an email address they shouldn't even have anymore)

    Not all of them are shit like that but most are so sticking with the preinstalled Windows Defender that does 95% of the alternatives results in users having a better experience.

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    Because defender has an amazing malware detection rate with few false positives.

    Much better than even the paid antiviruses like McAfee and Norton.

    Avast used to be good, but then it started to show ads every day.

    Plus, Defender uses close to no resources to run.