this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
49 points (98.0% liked)

Vancouver

1406 readers
1 users here now

Community for the city of Vancouver, BC

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

their answers mostly hovered around it being “divisive.” if you’re wondering what the fuck that means in the context of more housing for people, I’m right there with you.

they also said the provincial regulations will take care of this. That’s literally not true because of Shaugnessy’s exclusive zoning status.

in short, they don’t have a coherent argument against Boyle’s motion outside of pettiness.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Just read the press release on their website.The main reason they said is because it would waste city staff time and resources... So basically as u said, no reason.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

it would waste city staff time and resources

Meanwhile they do exactly that with the speed cameras motion. "Let's study this for two years more, even though it has been continuously studied for the past decades".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Ah, if we assume their formula to calculate usefulness of initiatives is "resources spent"/ " return". No wonder they will do the speed camera. When return is 0 the usefulness becomes infinite. I have been humbled.